Strategi Guru Dalam Merancang Pembelajaran Inovatif Berbasis Teknologi
Abstract
Pendidikan memiliki peran penting dalam membentuk kualitas sumber daya manusia, dan di dalamnya guru menjadi tokoh utama yang menentukan arah dan keberhasilan proses pembelajaran. Di era digital saat ini, guru dituntut untuk tidak hanya menguasai materi pelajaran, tetapi juga mampu merancang pembelajaran berbasis teknologi yang inovatif. Teknologi menghadirkan peluang besar untuk menciptakan pembelajaran yang lebih efektif, interaktif, dan sesuai dengan kebutuhan siswa masa kini. Melalui penggunaan multimedia, platform digital, dan Learning Management System (LMS), proses belajar menjadi lebih menarik, mudah diakses, dan mendorong siswa untuk lebih aktif berpartisipasi.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi kepustakaan dengan mengkaji berbagai buku, jurnal, dan artikel ilmiah yang relevan. Pendekatan ini memberikan gambaran menyeluruh mengenai dampak teknologi dalam pembelajaran, strategi yang dapat diterapkan guru, serta hambatan yang mungkin ditemui di lapangan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa model blended learning, flipped class, dan project-based learning (PBL) berbasis digital menjadi strategi yang paling banyak digunakan dan terbukti mampu meningkatkan hasil belajar dan keterlibatan siswa. Namun tantangan seperti keterbatasan infrastruktur, kesenjangan akses digital, serta kemampuan teknologi yang belum merata masih sering dijumpai.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
UNESCO. (2020). Education: From Disruption to Recovery. Diakses dari [UNESCO]
Pusat Penelitian Pendidikan (Puslitjak). (2021). Survei Kesiapan Teknologi Pendidikan di Indonesia. Diakses dari [Puslitjak].
Zahwa, F. A., & Syafi’i, I. (2022). Pemilihan pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi. Equilibrium: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Ekonomi, 19(01), 61-78.
https://jurnal.unikastpaulus.ac.id/index.php/jpkm/article/view/54
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Hal. 23-45
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403-423
Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2015). Continued Progress: Promising Evidence on Personalized Learning. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation
Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83.
Munir, Pembelajaran Digital, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017; Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P., “What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)?”, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 2009.
Bates, Tony. Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning. Vancouver: Tony Bates Associates Ltd., 2015; Siemens, George. “Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age,” 2005.
Smaldino, Sharon E., Deborah L. Lowther, & James D. Russell. Instructional Technology and Media for Learning. Boston: Pearson, 2012.
Tomlinson, Carol Ann & Imbeau, Marcia B. Alexandria: ASCD, 2010; Siemens, George. “Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age,” 2005.
Bergmann, Jonathan & Sams, Aaron. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), 2012; Graham, Charles R. “Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions,” dalam The Handbook of Blended Learning, ed. Curtis J. Bonk & Charles R. Graham. San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2006.
Larmer, John & Mergendoller, John R. Project Based Learning: A Guide to Standards-Focused Project Based Learning for Middle and High School Teachers. California: Buck Institute for Education, 2010.
Dick, Walter; Carey, Lou; & Carey, James O. The Systematic Design of Instruction. Boston: Pearson, 2015
Morrison, Gary R.; Ross, Steven M.; Kalman, Howard K.; & Kemp, Jerrold E. Designing Effective Instruction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
STE. (2017). ISTE Standards for Educators. International Society for Technology in Education.
Prensky, M. (2012). From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom: Hopeful Essays for 21st Century Learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
ISTE. ISTE Standards for Educators. International Society for Technology in Education, 2017; Prensky, Marc. “Digital Wisdom and the Future of Human Enhancement,” Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(3), 2009; Ertmer, Peggy A. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, Anne T. “Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 2010.
Partnership for 21st Century Learning.
Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day.
Thomas dalam Project-Based Learning: A Handbook for Teachers (2000
Ertmer dan Ottenbreit-Leftwich (2010) dalam artikelnya Teacher Technology Change
A. W. Bates, Teaching in a Digital Age.
A. W. Bates, Teaching in a Digital Age.
Robin & McNeil dalam Digital Learning: Transforming Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century
World Bank. (2022). Technology and Education: Closing the Digital Divide in Developing Regions. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
UNESCO. (2021). Technology in Education: Managing Digital Gaps in Remote and Low-Connectivity Areas.
DuFour, R., & Fullan, M. (2013). Cultures Built to Last: Systemic PLCs at Work. Solution Tree Press.
Ferguson, R. (2019). Learning Analytics: Balancing Data and Human Judgment in Education. Oxford University Press.
UNESCO. (2020). Education in a Post-COVID World: Nine Ideas for Public Action.
Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21). (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.